12/10/2023 0 Comments Walgreens color printingIt's more likely that Walgreens, CVS, Walmart, et. I'm going to disagree with this statement. So which one is wrong? (or both?) Since the Walgreen's printer is in a commercial operation, and is intended to make good prints, I expect that it is more likely to be right. The reasons are too complicated to explain here, so I hope you'll just trust me on this one. My last point: your eye tends to be much more critical with a physical print than with monitor color. If you let them auto-correct, this is just another fly in the ointment. For best control of the process, you would ideally not let them auto-correct. One important thing to be aware of is that printing services usually give the option to have your images printed "as is," with no adjustment, or with "auto-correction," where their system automatically tries to improve your image. If you ever suspect that your printing service has shifted, run another test image to see if it's any differnt. If you save these test prints, you can use these for future reference. If it were me, I'd take an image file that I know is good (you might download some on-line printer test images), then 1) make sure it looks good on your monitor and 2) try having it printed. Likewise, the Walgreen's printer is supposed to print this same color. So your computer monitor is supposed to show this definite color, or at least fairly close. The main issue is that any one specific set of RGB numbers in your image stand for a definite color (assuming it has a color profile). I tend to think the user (you) is more often the main problem, but as Lex says, it's hard to be sure where the (main) problem is. Hi Anne, yes, I think it is fairly common. They looked better on my computer, at least. Yesterday I sent out a few photos to Walgreens and when I picked them up, they looked crummy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |